For this particular
assignment, I would like to reflect upon watching Unbreakable,
and the class discussion we had on Friday, April 5th.
I thought that the movie was good, but I had a hard time getting
into it. There was a lot of back story given. Unlike any other
superhero movie we have viewed, the back story was not flashy at all.
It was rather dull. The most that intrigued me out of the whole
movie was the last thirty minutes. I loved seeing how all of the
back story was put together. The fact that Elijah was actually the
villain did not throw me off whatsoever. I distinctly remember
talking about the villain is normally the complete opposite of the
hero. Elijah states this in the movie, and that was my first clue.
I
really enjoyed the discussion we had about the movie in class on
Friday. As a theater person, casting is very important! The right
person must be picked for the role. I was disappointed when the
movie had Bruce Willis, but no action. This to me is a Bruce Willis
stereotype, ass-kicker. Dr. Harrison then asked us the question of
if this casting choice was on purpose. This to me was interesting.
Not only does this movie give the audience a different side of Bruce
Willis, but it also gives the audience a direct connection with the
film. The fact that this is not a movie based on action, it can
still give the audience something, which, in this case, was
unfulfilled potential, as Dr. Harrison pointed out. My
disappointment was purposefully just like the casting. It allowed me
to feel what David Dunne was feeling. This is a very interesting
concept, and brilliant at that. I'm glad my eyes were opened to this
type of concept because it is something that I could use in the
theater at any time.
I always find if cool when I connect to something in this class that I never thought I could. Like how you can connect to a movie and casting because you like theater.
ReplyDelete